Assignments
AI Powered Assessments. Results In Minutes.
A quiz tells you who can answer questions. An assignment tells you who can do the job. Describe the role, get a take-home built for it, and have every submission — a document, a GitHub repo or a ZIP of code — read and scored the moment it lands.
The gap
Take-homes are the best signal and the worst workflow.
Someone writes the brief on Friday. Candidates email zip files and Drive links back. Two engineers lose an afternoon reading them, score them differently, and nobody can say afterwards why one candidate beat another. The signal is excellent; the process is why teams stop running them.
How it works
Four steps, no email threads.
Describe the role, not the task
Enter the job role, the skills you are testing and a difficulty — Easy, Moderate, Advanced or Expert. A complete assignment comes back: scenario, requirements, deliverables, submission guidelines and evaluation criteria. Edit any of it, or write your own from scratch instead.
Pick how the work comes back
A typed answer, a Word/PDF upload, a GitHub repo link, or a ZIP of code — set the submission format the role actually calls for.
Share the link and watch it arrive
Share the assignment link with a due date. Candidates open it, read the brief and submit in the format you chose. You watch submissions arrive with their status.
Read the scored result
Every submission comes back with a score and written feedback against the criteria in the brief. Open the work itself in the browser — the document, the repository, or the ZIP unpacked file by file — adjust the score if you disagree, and add your own review.
Three kinds of work
Whatever the role actually produces.
Written answers and reports
Case studies, campaign plans, test strategies, analyses — anything a candidate writes rather than builds.
Types into the browser or uploads .doc / .docxRepositories
For work where commit history and project structure are part of what you are judging, not just the final file.
Submits a repository link; the code is read in placeZipped code
For candidates without a GitHub account, or work where a full repo is overkill.
Uploads a .zip; you browse it file by file in the review screenCalibration
Pitch it at the person you are hiring.
The same role generates a different brief at each level, so a graduate and a team lead are not handed the same take-home — and the scoring is judged against the level you chose, not an absolute bar.
What you get
Everything the review needs, in the review screen.
Review
The work, in the browser
Documents render, repositories open file by file, ZIPs unpack in place. Nothing to download, unzip or clone before you can judge it.
Control
The reviewer has the last word
Override the score, write your own feedback, rate the submission. The automatic pass is a first read, not a verdict.
Tracking
Due dates and status
See who has submitted, who is late and who has been reviewed, with the score beside each name in one list.
Reporting
Export the whole cohort
Names, emails, due dates, statuses and scores as a spreadsheet — with links back to each submission.
Part of iScalePro
One step in a longer process.
Everything the review needs, in the review screen.
Documents render, repositories open file by file, ZIPs unpack in place. Nothing to download, unzip or clone before you can judge it.